Alex Pang, PhD
OUTSIDE ONLINE has a new article, âEight of Our Favorite Writers on Why They Run.â Theyâre not simply writers who also happen to enjoy a jog; all of them see a connection between running and writing. For example, hereâs nonfiction writer Peter Hessler:
I think the mentality is somewhat similar, this sort of persistence-endurance.
I always go into a piece of writing with a plan, an idea of what I want to do, but there are things that come to me as Iâm working that I didnât expect, and I have to be loose and relaxed enough to let those things in. I notice that when I run, my mind is in that place, this sort of very free-flowing, unstructured, unfocused place. For me, itâs part of the whole mental space thatâs necessary to write.
Hereâs Joyce Carol Oates:
Ideally, the runner whoâs a writer is running through the land- and cityscapes of her fiction, like a ghost in a real setting.
The structural problems I set for myself in writing, in a long, snarled, frustrating, and sometimes despairing morning of work, for instance, I can usually unsnarl by running in the afternoon.
They generally donât try to think about problems when theyâre running, but do find itâs useful for jogging (as it were) new ideas or giving their subconscious space to think. As Poet Laureate emeritus Kay Ryan says, âConsciously thinking about what Iâll write is something I rarely do, although I may do some revising of poems in my head when Iâm running.â WIRED editor Nicholas Thompson says,
I do notice that a lot of the best thinking I get done, or ideas generation, or problem solving, happens when Iâm running and trying to focus on stuff outside of my head … I think probably for most things Iâve written or edited, thereâs been a key insight that came while I was running.
Running also teaches a kind of endurance thatâs useful to writers. Hereâs Kay Ryan again:
Both can be hard and unpleasant at times. But of the two, writing is much harder. When you go out for a run, you never fail, but you often fail when you set out to write a poem, even if you try your hardest.
This is not to say that all writers are runners, or vice versa. To be honest, I really dislike running. I find it boring and uncomfortable, and far prefer a long walk or hike or bike ride, or a couple circuits with the weight machines.
But even if you donât run, the article is still worthwhile because it gives a sense of how for them, running is a kind of deep play, and how deep play is important for their literary lives.
I argue at length in my book REST: WHY YOU GET MORE DONE WHEN YOU WORK LESS that deep play helps people be more creative, and often seems to extend their creative careers. What separates deep play from something thatâs merely diverting or distracting? What makes an activity compelling and interesting, rather than an interruption of their work?
For one thing, deep play provides many of the same psychological rewards and satisfactions as their work, but without the frustrations. For Winston Churchill, painting was deep play because painting was like politics: it required a clear vision and decisive action, but you didnât have the Labour party standing over your shoulder, saying that the trees were the wrong color.
Deep play is psychologically restorative because it offers those rewards in new and refreshing contexts. For many scientists who are rock climbers or mountai climbers, climbing is rewarding because it offers some of the same challenges as science, and demands concentration and attention; but unlike science, itâs very physically challenging, and offers quick, decisive rewardsâat the end of the day you reach the summit or you donât.
Deep play offers opportunities for flow, mastery, and control. Itâs deeply absorbing, and challenging enough to require time to conquer. Things that are too easy or too difficult, that donât have open-ended opportunities for improvement, tend to get abandoned.
Finally, deep play has some deeply personal or autobiographical dimension that connects them to family, or their homeland, or their younger selves. Biophysicist Britton Chance, for example, was an avid sailor from childhood, and even as a professor he sailed competitively, even winning a gold medal in the 1952 Olympics in Helsinki.
Itâs important to note that deep play isnât really an inherent property of some hobbies but not others. What Iâll find absorbing and engaging depends on my intellectual interests, the work I do, and my background. What all forms of deep play have in common is that theyâre a break from work that can otherwise be unhealthily consuming, but they also sustain a personâs ability to work. For some people, running is deep play; for others, it can be sailing, or gardening, or swimming, or painting (or other things).
In todayâs world, we often donât think of hobbies as being very important (side gigs and driving for Uber donât count). But in fact, finding your own deep play is important for having a more creative life.
Copyright Š Alex Pang. All Rights Reserved.
Alex Pang, PhD, a visiting scholar at Stanford University, has held fellowships at Microsoft Research Cambridge, the Saïd Business School at Oxford University, UCBerkeley, and Williams College. Visit his website at http://www.askpang.com.



Nice message.